Politics: Book 2

In Book 2 Aristotle’s goal is to demonstrate the need for a new theory of government, since neither a perfect theory nor a perfect government exists. Aristotle examines other

Theories of government and reviews existing constitutions of well governed states. He begins with an extended criticism of Plato's Republic, interpreting its main thrust to be that citizens should share in common as much as possible, including wives, children, and property. The goal of this community is to achieve as much unity in the city as possible, but Aristotle counters that the city involves an essential plurality: different people must make different contributions, fulfill different roles, and fit into distinct social classes. Otherwise, a city will not be able to perform the many functions necessary for it to remain self- sufficient. Aristotle disapproves of Plato's suggestion that men share the women of the city and that children be taken from their mothers at birth and raised collectively in state nurseries. By this proposal, no child would receive proper parental care, and the lack of family ties would render citizens less capable of showing friendship and love. Aristotle also notes that Plato does not explain how children can be transferred between social classes without great discord.

Aristotle also attacks Plato's remarks on the community of property, stating that the practice of generosity, an important virtue, requires individual ownership of property. The problems people often associate with ownership of private property arise not from privatization but from human wickedness. Most significantly, Aristotle sustains a defense of private property. Most of the theorists he attacks that seek to abolish private property do so with the intention of abolishing the greed and selfishness that accompany private property. Aristotle argues that these vices result from human wickedness, not from the mere existence of private property. Consequently, abolishing private property is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for eliminating vice. If people were equal and equally wealthy, for example, they would become lazy in their luxury. If people were equal and equally poor, they would quickly become discontented. The history of communism in the twentieth century has done a great deal to support Aristotle's claim that the abolition of private property is not enough to make people happy or virtuous. The solution is to share education, not property.

Aristotle then details the faults he has found with Plato's Laws: Plato's proposed city requires a vast territory but makes no provision for safe relations with neighbors; generosity, like temperance, should be a guiding principle regarding wealth; Plato says that land should be divided into even lots and distributed evenly between citizens but makes no allowance for fluctuations in population; and Plato seems to want a politeia, or balanced constitutional government but ends up with an oligarchy.

Aristotle also criticizes the theories proposed by Phaleas of Chalcedon and Hippodamus of Miletus. Phaleas's primary concern is the equalization of property, but he does not realize that material equality alone cannot make people good; rather, happiness arises out of moderation and education. Hippodamus's class distinctions are confused, his legal reforms unsavory, and his system of rewards dangerous.

Aristotle turns his attention to existing constitutions and finds none that is wholly satisfactory. He finds a number of problems with the much-admired Spartans' government: the system of serfdom leaves the ever-present danger of revolution; the undue freedom given to women presents many hazards, the worst of which is a dowry system that hurts the economy and the military; the Ephors, or overseers, are elected almost at random from the general populace; both Ephors and councilors are susceptible to bribes; and the state's two kings are not elected on the basis of merit.

Aristotle is dissatisfied also with Crete and Carthage. The Cretan system is elitist, susceptible to feuds, and has only remained safe thanks to its isolation from other states. While Carthage is superior to both Sparta and Crete, it rewards the rich too much, which encourages greediness.

-Soumita Adhikary